Monday, December 1, 2008 13:12 MST
Idaho Business Review
subscribeWANT THREE FREE ISSUES?
Daily EmailDaily e-mail updates
Real Estate EmailReal Estate e-mail updates
ADVERTISING? | CLASSIFIEDS | GOT A TIP? | TOP LIST | PAST SUBSCRIBER SURVEY

| RETURN TO HOME
RSS 2.0 CONTACT US at 208.336.3768
SEARCH ARCHIVES
See stories on: Idaho Companies Idaho Industries Idaho People

Newspaper Story

Transit coalition still negotiating local option legislation

POSTED: Monday, February 18, 2008

by Eddie Kovsky

Article Tools
Printer friendly edition Printer-friendly
E-mail this to a friend E-mail this
RSS Feed RSS feed
Digg this story Digg It!
Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us

Backers of a public transit bill are concerned their legislation may not get a hearing this legislative session.

Ken Burgess, spokesman for the Moving Idaho Forward coalition, said his group is continuing to negotiate with Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter and the House leadership about the legislation.
The proposal is similar to a public transit bill that was proposed last year. The legislation would give regional transportation authorities the ability to ask voters for permission to levy a local option sales tax to pay for regional transportation needs.
The bill has been expanded to apply anywhere a regional transportation authority exists, and allows for the local option revenue to be spent on roads and public transit.
Burgess said the House leadership first wants to pass a constitutional amendment to limit how a local option tax could be introduced.
They don’t want there to be an opportunity to lower the standards used to introduce the tax, like the supermajority requirement or the election date, Burgess said.
“As far as I know, there is no precedent for it; it’s not legally required but something they feel they want in place,” he said.
Before the bill can be heard on the House floor, it must first be approved by the House Revenue and Taxation Committee. That committee is allowed to introduce legislation at any time, so the bill could appear before the end of session.
It hasn’t so far.
Chairman Dennis Lake, R- Blackfoot, said he still hasn’t seen draft legislation.
“We’re becoming increasingly frustrated with the House’s desire to link a constitutional amendment [to the transportation bill],” Burgess said. “We want to have the bill heard.”

Leave a comment
Leave this field empty

Name:

Email:


You have characters left.

Commenters, let's maintain a civil discussion here. Please observe the following guidelines:

  1. Do not use profanity or euphemisms for profanity.
  2. Do not personally attack or bait other commenters.
  3. Express your own views; don't just argue for argument's sake.
  4. Sarcasm doesn't work on the Web. Either avoid it or clearly label it so you aren't misinterpreted.
  5. Don't make the same point repetitively.
  6. No spam. Link to a commercial site only if it's relevant to the discussion.
  7. Putting your name on your comments increases their value and credibility. However, if you must conceal your identity, please choose one pseudonym and stick to it. No "sock puppets."